blog

The role of lawyers as arbitration counsel has become increasingly essential, particularly for lawyers in Africa and the Middle East. These regions are rapidly integrating into the global economy, and local legal professionals are now required to navigate complex arbitration cases involving foreign entities, diverse legal frameworks, and significant cultural considerations. This session examines the role of arbitration counsel in representing clients in international arbitration, exploring specific responsibilities, challenges, and skills required for effective advocacy. Real-world examples, legal issues, and institutional considerations highlight key insights for counsel practicing in Africa and the Middle East.

1. Introduction

The primary role of lawyers as arbitration counsel is to represent and advocate for clients in arbitration proceedings, guiding them through procedural complexities, formulating case strategies, managing evidence, and presenting arguments to arbitrators. In Africa and the Middle East, where businesses are increasingly engaged in cross-border transactions, the demand for skilled arbitration counsel has risen significantly. Lawyers in these regions must be well-versed in the nuances of international arbitration, including institutional rules, applicable laws, and cultural factors that can influence arbitration outcomes.

This article discusses the responsibilities and critical areas of knowledge for arbitration counsel in Africa and the Middle East, highlighting examples and practical insights that are essential for effective representation.

2. Core Responsibilities of Arbitration Counsel

Arbitration counsel play a multifaceted role in managing arbitration cases, including drafting arbitration clauses, selecting appropriate venues, representing clients during proceedings, and ensuring the enforceability of awards. These core responsibilities are crucial to a successful arbitration process.

2.1 Drafting Arbitration Clauses

The first responsibility of arbitration counsel is often to draft clear, enforceable arbitration clauses within contracts. This requires careful consideration of jurisdiction, choice of law, and applicable arbitration rules.

• Example: A Saudi Arabian technology company negotiating a joint venture with a European partner required a carefully crafted arbitration clause to avoid jurisdictional disputes. By specifying the LCIA as the arbitration institution and London as the seat, arbitration counsel ensured that both parties would have access to a neutral venue and a reliable enforcement framework.

Practice Tip: Counsel should address key elements such as the seat of arbitration, language, governing law, and applicable institutional rules in the arbitration clause to prevent ambiguities that may lead to jurisdictional disputes.

2.2 Venue and Arbitrator Selection

Arbitration counsel must advise clients on choosing a suitable arbitration venue and selecting arbitrators with relevant expertise and neutrality. Venue and arbitrator selection are critical to ensuring fairness and efficiency in arbitration.

• Example: An Egyptian construction company involved in a dispute with a UAE-based supplier selected the Dubai International Arbitration Centre (DIAC) due to its proximity, cost-effectiveness, and familiarity with regional business practices. By selecting arbitrators knowledgeable in construction law and regional standards, arbitration counsel enhanced the credibility and acceptability of the arbitration process.

Practice Tip: When selecting arbitrators, counsel should assess their experience, knowledge of the industry, and cultural sensitivity, especially when disputes involve diverse parties from different jurisdictions.

2.3 Case Strategy and Evidence Management

Developing a clear case strategy is essential in arbitration, where counsel must balance assertive advocacy with adherence to procedural rules. Arbitration counsel are responsible for collecting and organizing evidence, coordinating with experts, and presenting a coherent argument.

• Example: In a cross-border dispute involving a Nigerian oil company and a French equipment supplier, arbitration counsel secured expert witnesses and arranged evidence from multiple jurisdictions. Effective evidence management enabled the Nigerian company to establish the validity of its claims and counter the supplier’s defenses.

Practice Tip: Counsel should implement a detailed evidence collection and preservation strategy, especially in cases involving technical or industry-specific issues where expert testimony is essential.

2.4 Enforceability of Arbitral Awards

Ensuring that an arbitral award is enforceable is a primary goal of arbitration. Arbitration counsel must understand the enforcement rules under the New York Convention and prepare to address potential objections based on public policy or arbitrability.

• Example: A Kenyan manufacturer that won an arbitration award against an Asian supplier faced enforcement challenges when the supplier argued that the award conflicted with local public policy. By preparing a robust case for enforcement under the New York Convention, arbitration counsel successfully secured compliance.

Practice Tip: Counsel should familiarize themselves with the enforcement standards in the jurisdiction where the award will be enforced and anticipate any public policy or arbitrability objections that may arise.

3. Specific Issues Faced by Arbitration Counsel in Africa and the Middle East

Despite the growing popularity of arbitration, arbitration counsel in Africa and the Middle East face unique challenges. These challenges include navigating public policy interpretations, managing arbitrability issues, understanding institutional biases, and addressing language and cultural considerations.

3.1 Public Policy and Enforcement Challenges

Some African and Middle Eastern countries interpret public policy broadly, which can impact the enforcement of arbitral awards that conflict with local laws or values. This is especially relevant when awards involve sensitive sectors such as finance or natural resources.

• Example: In Nigeria v. Process & Industrial Developments Limited (P&ID), Nigerian courts scrutinized the arbitral award based on alleged corruption and public policy concerns, illustrating how public policy can influence enforcement decisions in sensitive cases.

Practice Tip: Counsel should conduct due diligence on public policy standards in enforcement jurisdictions, advising clients on strategies to mitigate risks associated with public policy objections.

3.2 Arbitrability Concerns

Each jurisdiction determines what types of disputes can be arbitrated. In Africa and the Middle East, certain areas—such as real estate, employment, and family law—may not be arbitrable due to local laws and religious principles.

• Example: A dispute involving a Middle Eastern real estate project was deemed non-arbitrable in the local courts, highlighting the importance of verifying arbitrability at the outset to avoid jurisdictional conflicts later.

Practice Tip: Counsel should verify the arbitrability of issues before proceeding, ensuring that the matter falls within the permissible scope of arbitration in the relevant jurisdiction.

3.3 Institutional Bias and Familiarity with Regional Institutions

African and Middle Eastern clients may encounter perceived or actual biases in certain international institutions. In response, regional institutions such as DIAC (Dubai) and CRCICA (Cairo) have gained prominence as alternatives to traditional Western institutions.

• Example: An Algerian company opted for arbitration under CRCICA rules instead of the ICC, seeking a forum familiar with regional practices and legal principles. The CRCICA’s understanding of regional norms facilitated a fair and culturally sensitive process.

Practice Tip: Arbitration counsel should assess the institutional rules of various regional and international centers, advising clients on institutions that align with their procedural preferences and cultural considerations.

3.4 Language and Cultural Sensitivity

Cross-border arbitration often involves parties from diverse linguistic and cultural backgrounds, which can affect communication and interpretation during proceedings. Arbitration counsel must be sensitive to language preferences and cultural norms to ensure smooth proceedings.

• Example: In a dispute between a Lebanese distributor and a North African company, arbitration counsel arranged for Arabic-speaking arbitrators and translators to facilitate clear communication, respecting the parties’ linguistic preferences.

Practice Tip: Counsel should confirm the language of arbitration in advance and select arbitrators who can navigate linguistic and cultural nuances, reducing the risk of misunderstandings or procedural delays.

4. Key Legal and Institutional Knowledge for Arbitration Counsel

In addition to specific procedural skills, arbitration counsel must possess knowledge of relevant legal and institutional frameworks to represent clients effectively. This includes familiarity with major arbitration conventions, understanding of regional institutions, and an awareness of local enforcement practices.

4.1 Familiarity with the New York Convention

The New York Convention provides the framework for enforcing foreign arbitral awards in over 160 countries, making it essential knowledge for arbitration counsel representing clients in cross-border cases.

Practice Tip: Arbitration counsel should understand the grounds for refusing enforcement under Article V of the New York Convention, preparing clients for potential public policy objections and other enforcement challenges.

4.2 Institutional Rules of Leading Arbitration Centers

Each arbitration institution has its own rules, and arbitration counsel must be familiar with those of leading centers such as the ICC, LCIA, DIAC, and CRCICA. This includes knowledge of emergency arbitrator provisions, confidentiality obligations, and cost structures.

Practice Tip: Lawyers should match institutional rules to clients’ specific needs. For example, LCIA’s emergency arbitrator provisions are ideal for urgent interim measures, while CRCICA offers cost-effective options for regional disputes.

4.3 Local Enforcement Procedures

Enforcement of awards in African and Middle Eastern jurisdictions may involve local legal considerations, including compliance with public policy and arbitrability requirements. Familiarity with these local enforcement standards can make the difference between a successful award and prolonged enforcement challenges.

Practice Tip: Counsel should conduct research into local enforcement practices and engage local experts when necessary to streamline the enforcement process.

4.4 Cultural Awareness and Language Proficiency

Counsel should be able to navigate linguistic and cultural differences effectively. This may involve selecting arbitration languages and arranging for culturally aware arbitrators to address sensitivities specific to the dispute.

Practice Tip: For disputes involving Middle Eastern parties, Arabic-speaking arbitrators or those familiar with Sharia law may be suitable. Ensuring that language preferences are clearly agreed upon can prevent procedural issues.

5. Conclusion

The role of arbitration counsel in Africa and the Middle East is multifaceted and requires deep understanding of both procedural skills and regional considerations. From drafting arbitration clauses and selecting suitable venues to managing evidence and ensuring enforceability, arbitration counsel must navigate complex legal landscapes and address unique challenges posed by public policy, arbitrability, and cultural sensitivities.

By mastering key responsibilities and developing expertise in conventions like the New York Convention and institutions like ICC, LCIA, DIAC, and CRCICA, arbitration counsel can provide clients with strategic guidance and effective representation in cross

References:

• International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), “Arbitration and ADR,” accessed October 2024.
• New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, United Nations.
• UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration, United Nations Commission on International Trade Law.